New here? How to read these predictions
- Win probability
- Our model's estimate that a fighter wins — e.g. 72% means we'd expect them to win roughly 7 of 10 times.
- Confidence interval (CI)
- The range the true probability likely falls in. Wider = less certain. A pick'em fight has a wide band; a clear favourite a narrow one.
- Edge
- How much higher our probability is than the bookmaker's implied odds. Positive edge = we think it's underpriced.
- EV (expected value)
- Average return if you placed the bet many times. +15% EV means about 15c profit per $1 staked, on average.
- Risk tiers
- Conservative leans to safe favourites, Balanced blends, Aggressive chases bigger-odds longshots. Pick what suits you.
- Edge badges
- Strong / Solid / Slight edge rank how much value the model sees — and how big a stake it suggests. They're not a promise the bet wins.
Tap any fight row to open the full model breakdown. New to the model itself? How it works · FAQ.
Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 7
- Norbert Novenyi is favoured at 57% — fight-history features sparse
- Model uncertainty: ±5pp on the win probability
-
01 Model lean favours Novenyi
Norbert Novenyi is favoured at 57% — fight-history features sparse
- Jaden Ortega is favoured at 53% — fight-history features sparse
- Model uncertainty: ±8pp on the win probability
-
01 Model lean favours Ortega
Jaden Ortega is favoured at 53% — fight-history features sparse
- Marcos Degli is favoured at 55% — fight-history features sparse
- Model uncertainty: ±5pp on the win probability
-
01 Model lean favours Degli
Marcos Degli is favoured at 55% — fight-history features sparse
- Callum Connor is favoured at 53% — fight-history features sparse
- Model uncertainty: ±9pp on the win probability
-
01 Model lean favours Connor
Callum Connor is favoured at 53% — fight-history features sparse
- Damian Piwowarczyk is favoured at 54% — fight-history features sparse
- Model uncertainty: ±5pp on the win probability
-
01 Model lean favours Piwowarczyk
Damian Piwowarczyk is favoured at 54% — fight-history features sparse
UFC Fight Night: Rosas Jr. vs. Barcelos
- Raul Rosas Jr. eats 2.9 fewer strikes per minute
- Raul Rosas Jr. hits 0.28 more takedowns per minute
- Raul Rosas Jr. taps opponents 15% more often
- the case against Raoni Barcelos lands 3.3 more sig strikes per minute
- Raoni Barcelos out-volumes opponents at 4.7 sig/min vs Raul Rosas Jr.'s 1.3
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Jr.
Raul Rosas Jr. eats 2.9 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Barcelos
Raoni Barcelos lands 3.3 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Takedown defence favours Barcelos
Raoni Barcelos stuffs 54% more incoming takedowns
-
04 Takedown volume favours Jr.
Raul Rosas Jr. hits 0.28 more takedowns per minute
-
05 Submission rate favours Jr.
Raul Rosas Jr. taps opponents 15% more often
-
06 Control time favours Jr.
Raul Rosas Jr. controls 32% more cage time
- Rodolfo Vieira taps opponents 45% more often
- Rodolfo Vieira lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
- Rodolfo Vieira finishes 30% more of their wins
- the case against Robert Bryczek finishes by KO 24% more often
- Robert Bryczek has never been finished in 3 fights
-
01 Submission rate favours Vieira
Rodolfo Vieira taps opponents 45% more often
-
02 Striking volume favours Vieira
Rodolfo Vieira lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Vieira
Rodolfo Vieira finishes 30% more of their wins
-
04 Strikes absorbed favours Vieira
Rodolfo Vieira eats 0.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
05 KO rate favours Bryczek
Robert Bryczek finishes by KO 24% more often
-
06 Takedown volume favours Vieira
Rodolfo Vieira hits 0.17 more takedowns per minute
- Model uncertainty: ±6pp on the win probability
- Valesca Machado is favoured at 68% — fight-history features sparse
- Model uncertainty: ±4pp on the win probability
-
01 Model lean favours Machado
Valesca Machado is favoured at 68% — fight-history features sparse
- Rinya Nakamura eats 2.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Rinya Nakamura stuffs 57% more incoming takedowns
- Rinya Nakamura finishes by KO 16% more often
- the case against Brady Hiestand rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- layoff Hiestand hasn't fought since Jun 2024 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Brady Hiestand rides a 3-fight win streak (Rinya Nakamura: 1)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Nakamura
Rinya Nakamura eats 2.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Hiestand
Brady Hiestand rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
03 Takedown defence favours Nakamura
Rinya Nakamura stuffs 57% more incoming takedowns
-
04 Submission rate favours Hiestand
Brady Hiestand taps opponents 24% more often
-
05 Takedown volume favours Hiestand
Brady Hiestand hits 0.15 more takedowns per minute
-
06 KO rate favours Nakamura
Rinya Nakamura finishes by KO 16% more often
- Rodolfo Bellato lands 3.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Rodolfo Bellato finishes 40% more of their wins
- Rodolfo Bellato finishes by KO 40% more often
- the case against Christian Edwards eats 3.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Rodolfo Bellato out-volumes opponents at 5.4 sig/min vs Christian Edwards's 1.8
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Edwards
Christian Edwards eats 3.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Bellato
Rodolfo Bellato lands 3.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Bellato
Rodolfo Bellato finishes 40% more of their wins
-
04 KO rate favours Bellato
Rodolfo Bellato finishes by KO 40% more often
-
05 Win streak favours Bellato
Rodolfo Bellato rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
06 Striking accuracy favours Bellato
Rodolfo Bellato is 20% more accurate on the feet
- Elves Brener eats 5.1 fewer strikes per minute
- Elves Brener lands 3.0 more sig strikes per minute
- Elves Brener stuffs 76% more incoming takedowns
- the case against Josiah Harrell finishes 26% more of their wins
- Elves Brener out-volumes opponents at 4.8 sig/min vs Josiah Harrell's 1.8
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Brener
Elves Brener eats 5.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Brener
Elves Brener lands 3.0 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Takedown defence favours Brener
Elves Brener stuffs 76% more incoming takedowns
-
04 Finish rate favours Harrell
Josiah Harrell finishes 26% more of their wins
-
05 KO durability favours Brener
Elves Brener has been KO'd 83% less often
-
06 KO rate favours Harrell
Josiah Harrell finishes by KO 26% more often
- Montel Jackson eats 2.6 fewer strikes per minute
- Montel Jackson is 12% more accurate on the feet
- the case against Ricky Simon finishes 10% more of their wins
- Montel Jackson has never been finished in 13 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Jackson
Montel Jackson eats 2.6 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Finish rate favours Simon
Ricky Simon finishes 10% more of their wins
-
03 Striking accuracy favours Jackson
Montel Jackson is 12% more accurate on the feet
-
04 Takedown volume favours Simon
Ricky Simon hits 0.08 more takedowns per minute
-
05 Submission rate favours Simon
Ricky Simon taps opponents 10% more often
-
06 Takedown defence favours Simon
Ricky Simon stuffs 11% more incoming takedowns
- Ailin Perez rides a 6-fight longer win streak
- Ailin Perez eats 0.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Ailin Perez hits 0.23 more takedowns per minute
- the case against Norma Dumont lands 1.0 more sig strikes per minute
- Ailin Perez rides a 6-fight win streak (Norma Dumont: 0)
-
01 Win streak favours Perez
Ailin Perez rides a 6-fight longer win streak
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Perez
Ailin Perez eats 0.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Striking volume favours Dumont
Norma Dumont lands 1.0 more sig strikes per minute
-
04 Takedown volume favours Perez
Ailin Perez hits 0.23 more takedowns per minute
-
05 Finish rate favours Perez
Ailin Perez finishes 20% more of their wins
-
06 Submission rate favours Perez
Ailin Perez taps opponents 14% more often
- John Castaneda lands 2.4 more sig strikes per minute
- John Castaneda finishes 22% more of their wins
- John Castaneda is 19% more accurate on the feet
- the case against Alatengheili eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
- John Castaneda out-volumes opponents at 5.2 sig/min vs Alatengheili's 2.8
-
01 Striking volume favours Castaneda
John Castaneda lands 2.4 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Alatengheili
Alatengheili eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Castaneda
John Castaneda finishes 22% more of their wins
-
04 Striking accuracy favours Castaneda
John Castaneda is 19% more accurate on the feet
-
05 KO rate favours Castaneda
John Castaneda finishes by KO 11% more often
-
06 Loss streak favours Alatengheili
Alatengheili comes in on a 2-fight cleaner skid
- Yazmin Jauregui lands 3.0 more sig strikes per minute
- Yazmin Jauregui eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
- Yazmin Jauregui stuffs 72% more incoming takedowns
- layoff Jauregui hasn't fought since Sep 2024 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Yazmin Jauregui out-volumes opponents at 6.6 sig/min vs Vanessa Demopoulos's 3.6
-
01 Striking volume favours Jauregui
Yazmin Jauregui lands 3.0 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Jauregui
Yazmin Jauregui eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Takedown defence favours Jauregui
Yazmin Jauregui stuffs 72% more incoming takedowns
-
04 Finish rate favours Jauregui
Yazmin Jauregui finishes 40% more of their wins
-
05 KO rate favours Jauregui
Yazmin Jauregui finishes by KO 40% more often
-
06 Striking defence favours Jauregui
Yazmin Jauregui avoids 14% more incoming strikes
UFC 332: Silva vs. Wang
⏱ Sun 4 Oct · 12:30 PM AEST
- Natalia Silva rides a 4-fight longer win streak
- Natalia Silva eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Natalia Silva finishes by KO 8% more often
- the case against Wang Cong lands 2.0 more sig strikes per minute
- Natalia Silva rides a 8-fight win streak (Wang Cong: 4)
-
01 Striking volume favours Cong
Wang Cong lands 2.0 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Silva
Natalia Silva rides a 4-fight longer win streak
-
03 Strikes absorbed favours Silva
Natalia Silva eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
04 Striking accuracy favours Cong
Wang Cong is 13% more accurate on the feet
-
05 Finish rate favours Cong
Wang Cong finishes 8% more of their wins
-
06 KO rate favours Silva
Natalia Silva finishes by KO 8% more often
⏱ Sun 4 Oct · 11:45 AM AEST
- Payton Talbott lands 3.3 more sig strikes per minute
- Payton Talbott eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
- Payton Talbott rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- Payton Talbott out-volumes opponents at 5.9 sig/min vs Deiveson Figueiredo's 2.6
-
01 Striking volume favours Talbott
Payton Talbott lands 3.3 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Talbott
Payton Talbott eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Talbott
Payton Talbott rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
04 Takedown defence favours Talbott
Payton Talbott stuffs 15% more incoming takedowns
-
05 Loss streak favours Talbott
Payton Talbott comes in on a 2-fight cleaner skid
-
06 KO rate favours Talbott
Payton Talbott finishes by KO 6% more often
- Esteban Ribovics lands 0.8 more sig strikes per minute
- the case against King Green eats 2.0 fewer strikes per minute
- King Green rides a 4-fight win streak (Esteban Ribovics: 1)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Green
King Green eats 2.0 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Green
King Green rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
03 Striking volume favours Ribovics
Esteban Ribovics lands 0.8 more sig strikes per minute
-
04 Finish rate favours Green
King Green finishes 8% more of their wins
-
05 Striking accuracy favours Green
King Green is 10% more accurate on the feet
-
06 Submission rate favours Green
King Green taps opponents 10% more often
- Khaos Williams rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- Khaos Williams out-volumes opponents at 5.0 sig/min vs Roberto Soldic's 0.0
-
01 Win streak favours Williams
Khaos Williams rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- Ateba Gautier eats 2.0 fewer strikes per minute
- Ateba Gautier rides a 4-fight longer win streak
- Ateba Gautier finishes by KO 38% more often
- the case against Roman Kopylov lands 0.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Ateba Gautier rides a 5-fight win streak (Roman Kopylov: 1)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Gautier
Ateba Gautier eats 2.0 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Gautier
Ateba Gautier rides a 4-fight longer win streak
-
03 KO rate favours Gautier
Ateba Gautier finishes by KO 38% more often
-
04 Striking volume favours Kopylov
Roman Kopylov lands 0.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
05 Finish rate favours Gautier
Ateba Gautier finishes 22% more of their wins
-
06 Striking accuracy favours Kopylov
Roman Kopylov is 13% more accurate on the feet
- Imanol Rodriguez finishes 71% more of their wins
- Imanol Rodriguez lands 1.4 more sig strikes per minute
- Imanol Rodriguez finishes by KO 71% more often
- the case against Alden Coria rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- Alden Coria rides a 3-fight win streak (Imanol Rodriguez: 1)
-
01 Finish rate favours Rodriguez
Imanol Rodriguez finishes 71% more of their wins
-
02 Striking volume favours Rodriguez
Imanol Rodriguez lands 1.4 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 KO rate favours Rodriguez
Imanol Rodriguez finishes by KO 71% more often
-
04 Win streak favours Coria
Alden Coria rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
05 Strikes absorbed favours Coria
Alden Coria eats 0.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
06 Striking accuracy favours Rodriguez
Imanol Rodriguez is 18% more accurate on the feet
- Damian Pinas lands 3.0 more sig strikes per minute
- Damian Pinas finishes by KO 75% more often
- Damian Pinas finishes 50% more of their wins
- the case against Andrey Pulyaev eats 2.6 fewer strikes per minute
- Damian Pinas out-volumes opponents at 5.5 sig/min vs Andrey Pulyaev's 2.5
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Pulyaev
Andrey Pulyaev eats 2.6 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Pinas
Damian Pinas lands 3.0 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 KO rate favours Pinas
Damian Pinas finishes by KO 75% more often
-
04 Finish rate favours Pinas
Damian Pinas finishes 50% more of their wins
-
05 Win streak favours Pinas
Damian Pinas rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
06 Takedown defence favours Pinas
Damian Pinas stuffs 40% more incoming takedowns
- Marcus McGhee eats 1.0 fewer strikes per minute
- Marcus McGhee lands 1.6 more sig strikes per minute
- Marcus McGhee has been KO'd 33% less often
- the case against Benardo Sopaj rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- Marcus McGhee out-volumes opponents at 5.4 sig/min vs Benardo Sopaj's 3.9
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours McGhee
Marcus McGhee eats 1.0 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours McGhee
Marcus McGhee lands 1.6 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Sopaj
Benardo Sopaj rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
04 Takedown volume favours Sopaj
Benardo Sopaj hits 0.13 more takedowns per minute
-
05 KO durability favours McGhee
Marcus McGhee has been KO'd 33% less often
-
06 Submission rate favours Sopaj
Benardo Sopaj taps opponents 13% more often
- Mick Parkin lands 1.0 more sig strikes per minute
- Mick Parkin stuffs 25% more incoming takedowns
- Mick Parkin avoids 11% more incoming strikes
- the case against Johnny Walker eats 1.1 fewer strikes per minute
- layoff Parkin hasn't fought since Mar 2025 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Mick Parkin has never been finished in 5 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Walker
Johnny Walker eats 1.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Parkin
Mick Parkin lands 1.0 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Walker
Johnny Walker finishes 49% more of their wins
-
04 KO rate favours Walker
Johnny Walker finishes by KO 42% more often
-
05 Takedown defence favours Parkin
Mick Parkin stuffs 25% more incoming takedowns
-
06 Striking defence favours Parkin
Mick Parkin avoids 11% more incoming strikes
- Alexander Hernandez lands 0.7 more sig strikes per minute
- Alexander Hernandez finishes by KO 22% more often
- Alexander Hernandez finishes 11% more of their wins
- the case against Rafael Dos Anjos eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
- layoff Anjos hasn't fought since Oct 2024 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Rafael Dos Anjos has never been finished in 36 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Anjos
Rafael Dos Anjos eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Hernandez
Alexander Hernandez lands 0.7 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 KO rate favours Hernandez
Alexander Hernandez finishes by KO 22% more often
-
04 Finish rate favours Hernandez
Alexander Hernandez finishes 11% more of their wins
-
05 Submission rate favours Anjos
Rafael Dos Anjos taps opponents 14% more often
-
06 Takedown defence favours Hernandez
Alexander Hernandez stuffs 14% more incoming takedowns
- Ismail Naurdiev eats 2.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Ismail Naurdiev rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- Ismail Naurdiev comes in on a 4-fight cleaner skid
- the case against Marvin Vettori lands 1.1 more sig strikes per minute
- Marvin Vettori has never been finished in 18 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Naurdiev
Ismail Naurdiev eats 2.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Vettori
Marvin Vettori lands 1.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Naurdiev
Ismail Naurdiev rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
04 Loss streak favours Naurdiev
Ismail Naurdiev comes in on a 4-fight cleaner skid
-
05 KO rate favours Naurdiev
Ismail Naurdiev finishes by KO 14% more often
-
06 Submission rate favours Vettori
Marvin Vettori taps opponents 11% more often
- Court McGee lands 2.8 more sig strikes per minute
- Court McGee stuffs 27% more incoming takedowns
- Court McGee avoids 16% more incoming strikes
- the case against Eric Nolan eats 1.1 fewer strikes per minute
- Court McGee out-volumes opponents at 4.5 sig/min vs Eric Nolan's 1.7
-
01 Striking volume favours McGee
Court McGee lands 2.8 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Nolan
Eric Nolan eats 1.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Nolan
Eric Nolan finishes 25% more of their wins
-
04 Takedown defence favours McGee
Court McGee stuffs 27% more incoming takedowns
-
05 Striking defence favours McGee
Court McGee avoids 16% more incoming strikes
-
06 Takedown volume favours McGee
Court McGee hits 0.12 more takedowns per minute
- Anthony Wint rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- Anthony Wint has never been finished in 1 fights
-
01 Win streak favours Wint
Anthony Wint rides a 1-fight longer win streak
UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan
- Brendan Allen taps opponents 37% more often
- Brendan Allen finishes 8% more of their wins
- the case against Christian Leroy Duncan eats 1.4 fewer strikes per minute
- Christian Leroy Duncan rides a 5-fight win streak (Brendan Allen: 3)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Duncan
Christian Leroy Duncan eats 1.4 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Duncan
Christian Leroy Duncan rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
03 Striking volume favours Duncan
Christian Leroy Duncan lands 0.7 more sig strikes per minute
-
04 Submission rate favours Allen
Brendan Allen taps opponents 37% more often
-
05 KO rate favours Duncan
Christian Leroy Duncan finishes by KO 29% more often
-
06 Finish rate favours Allen
Brendan Allen finishes 8% more of their wins
UFC Fight Night: Buckley vs. Malott
- Joaquin Buckley finishes by KO 15% more often
- the case against Mike Malott rides a 4-fight longer win streak
- Mike Malott rides a 4-fight win streak (Joaquin Buckley: 0)
-
01 Win streak favours Malott
Mike Malott rides a 4-fight longer win streak
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Malott
Mike Malott eats 0.3 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Submission rate favours Malott
Mike Malott taps opponents 25% more often
-
04 Striking volume favours Malott
Mike Malott lands 0.3 more sig strikes per minute
-
05 KO rate favours Buckley
Joaquin Buckley finishes by KO 15% more often
-
06 Striking accuracy favours Malott
Mike Malott is 16% more accurate on the feet
⏱ Sun 18 Oct · 10:00 AM AEST
- Erin Blanchfield lands 1.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Erin Blanchfield rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- Erin Blanchfield taps opponents 19% more often
- the case against Jasmine Jasudavicius eats 0.9 fewer strikes per minute
- Erin Blanchfield out-volumes opponents at 5.2 sig/min vs Jasmine Jasudavicius's 3.4
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Jasudavicius
Jasmine Jasudavicius eats 0.9 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Blanchfield
Erin Blanchfield lands 1.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Blanchfield
Erin Blanchfield rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
04 Submission rate favours Blanchfield
Erin Blanchfield taps opponents 19% more often
-
05 Finish rate favours Blanchfield
Erin Blanchfield finishes 11% more of their wins
-
06 KO rate favours Jasudavicius
Jasmine Jasudavicius finishes by KO 8% more often
- Kyle Daukaus eats 2.7 fewer strikes per minute
- Kyle Daukaus finishes 13% more of their wins
- Kyle Daukaus hits 0.11 more takedowns per minute
- the case against Marc-Andre Barriault lands 2.8 more sig strikes per minute
- Marc-Andre Barriault out-volumes opponents at 5.6 sig/min vs Kyle Daukaus's 2.9
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Daukaus
Kyle Daukaus eats 2.7 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Barriault
Marc-Andre Barriault lands 2.8 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Daukaus
Kyle Daukaus finishes 13% more of their wins
-
04 Takedown volume favours Daukaus
Kyle Daukaus hits 0.11 more takedowns per minute
-
05 Submission rate favours Daukaus
Kyle Daukaus taps opponents 14% more often
-
06 Control time favours Daukaus
Kyle Daukaus controls 31% more cage time
- the case against Louis Jourdain comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
- Timmy Cuamba has a 5-fight UFC experience edge (5 vs 0)
-
01 Loss streak favours Jourdain
Louis Jourdain comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
- Nate Landwehr eats 3.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Nate Landwehr has been KO'd 55% less often
- Nate Landwehr avoids 19% more incoming strikes
- the case against Mandel Nallo finishes by KO 21% more often
- Nate Landwehr KOs 55% of opponents — Mandel Nallo has been KO'd in 100% of losses
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Landwehr
Nate Landwehr eats 3.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 KO rate favours Nallo
Mandel Nallo finishes by KO 21% more often
-
03 KO durability favours Landwehr
Nate Landwehr has been KO'd 55% less often
-
04 Striking defence favours Landwehr
Nate Landwehr avoids 19% more incoming strikes
-
05 Striking volume favours Nallo
Mandel Nallo lands 0.3 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 Submission rate favours Landwehr
Nate Landwehr taps opponents 18% more often
- Jhonata Diniz finishes 15% more of their wins
- Jhonata Diniz finishes by KO 15% more often
- the case against Tanner Boser lands 1.1 more sig strikes per minute
- Tanner Boser out-volumes opponents at 4.8 sig/min vs Jhonata Diniz's 3.7
-
01 Striking volume favours Boser
Tanner Boser lands 1.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Boser
Tanner Boser eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Diniz
Jhonata Diniz finishes 15% more of their wins
-
04 KO rate favours Diniz
Jhonata Diniz finishes by KO 15% more often
-
05 KO durability favours Boser
Tanner Boser has been KO'd 22% less often
-
06 Durability favours Boser
Tanner Boser has been finished 22% less often
- Gilbert Urbina lands 5.4 more sig strikes per minute
- Gilbert Urbina finishes by KO 80% more often
- Gilbert Urbina rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- the case against Julien Leblanc eats 1.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Gilbert Urbina out-volumes opponents at 6.7 sig/min vs Julien Leblanc's 1.3
-
01 Striking volume favours Urbina
Gilbert Urbina lands 5.4 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Leblanc
Julien Leblanc eats 1.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 KO rate favours Urbina
Gilbert Urbina finishes by KO 80% more often
-
04 Win streak favours Urbina
Gilbert Urbina rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
05 Finish rate favours Urbina
Gilbert Urbina finishes 24% more of their wins
-
06 Takedown volume favours Urbina
Gilbert Urbina hits 0.18 more takedowns per minute
- the case against Javad Mahjoub comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
- Model uncertainty: ±6pp on the win probability
-
01 Loss streak favours Mahjoub
Javad Mahjoub comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
- Jamey-Lyn Horth eats 1.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Jamey-Lyn Horth stuffs 31% more incoming takedowns
- Jamey-Lyn Horth is 13% more accurate on the feet
- the case against Katlyn Cerminara lands 0.8 more sig strikes per minute
- layoff Cerminara hasn't fought since Mar 2024 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Jamey-Lyn Horth has never been finished in 7 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Horth
Jamey-Lyn Horth eats 1.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Cerminara
Katlyn Cerminara lands 0.8 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Takedown defence favours Horth
Jamey-Lyn Horth stuffs 31% more incoming takedowns
-
04 Striking accuracy favours Horth
Jamey-Lyn Horth is 13% more accurate on the feet
-
05 Takedown volume favours Horth
Jamey-Lyn Horth hits 0.04 more takedowns per minute
-
06 Loss streak favours Horth
Jamey-Lyn Horth comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
- Steven Koslow finishes by KO 56% more often
- Steven Koslow finishes 36% more of their wins
- Steven Koslow hits 0.21 more takedowns per minute
- the case against Chad Anheliger lands 2.5 more sig strikes per minute
- layoff Anheliger hasn't fought since Nov 2024 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- layoff Koslow hasn't fought since Dec 2022 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Chad Anheliger has never been finished in 5 fights
-
01 Striking volume favours Anheliger
Chad Anheliger lands 2.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Anheliger
Chad Anheliger eats 0.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 KO rate favours Koslow
Steven Koslow finishes by KO 56% more often
-
04 Finish rate favours Koslow
Steven Koslow finishes 36% more of their wins
-
05 KO durability favours Anheliger
Chad Anheliger has been KO'd 100% less often
-
06 Takedown volume favours Koslow
Steven Koslow hits 0.21 more takedowns per minute
- Melissa Croden eats 2.1 fewer strikes per minute
- Melissa Croden stuffs 42% more incoming takedowns
- Melissa Croden avoids 19% more incoming strikes
- the case against Chelsea Chandler finishes 21% more of their wins
- Melissa Croden has never been finished in 3 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Croden
Melissa Croden eats 2.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Takedown defence favours Croden
Melissa Croden stuffs 42% more incoming takedowns
-
03 Finish rate favours Chandler
Chelsea Chandler finishes 21% more of their wins
-
04 Striking defence favours Croden
Melissa Croden avoids 19% more incoming strikes
-
05 Submission rate favours Chandler
Chelsea Chandler taps opponents 17% more often
-
06 Striking volume favours Croden
Melissa Croden lands 0.2 more sig strikes per minute
- the case against Cody Chovancek comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
- Model uncertainty: ±6pp on the win probability
-
01 Loss streak favours Chovancek
Cody Chovancek comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
UFC 333: Volkanovski vs. Evloev
⏱ Sun 25 Oct · 6:30 AM AEST
- Movsar Evloev rides a 8-fight longer win streak
- Movsar Evloev eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Movsar Evloev hits 0.21 more takedowns per minute
- the case against Alexander Volkanovski lands 2.1 more sig strikes per minute
- Movsar Evloev rides a 10-fight win streak (Alexander Volkanovski: 2)
-
01 Win streak favours Evloev
Movsar Evloev rides a 8-fight longer win streak
-
02 Striking volume favours Volkanovski
Alexander Volkanovski lands 2.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Strikes absorbed favours Evloev
Movsar Evloev eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
04 Finish rate favours Volkanovski
Alexander Volkanovski finishes 39% more of their wins
-
05 KO rate favours Volkanovski
Alexander Volkanovski finishes by KO 39% more often
-
06 Takedown volume favours Evloev
Movsar Evloev hits 0.21 more takedowns per minute
⏱ Sun 25 Oct · 5:45 AM AEST
- Petr Yan rides a 4-fight longer win streak
- Petr Yan lands 0.8 more sig strikes per minute
- Petr Yan finishes by KO 21% more often
- the case against Merab Dvalishvili eats 1.4 fewer strikes per minute
- Petr Yan rides a 4-fight win streak (Merab Dvalishvili: 0)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Dvalishvili
Merab Dvalishvili eats 1.4 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Yan
Petr Yan rides a 4-fight longer win streak
-
03 Striking volume favours Yan
Petr Yan lands 0.8 more sig strikes per minute
-
04 Takedown volume favours Dvalishvili
Merab Dvalishvili hits 0.30 more takedowns per minute
-
05 KO rate favours Yan
Petr Yan finishes by KO 21% more often
-
06 Striking accuracy favours Yan
Petr Yan is 13% more accurate on the feet
- Ramazan Temirov rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Ramazan Temirov finishes by KO 47% more often
- Ramazan Temirov eats 0.3 fewer strikes per minute
- Ramazan Temirov rides a 3-fight win streak (Lone'er Kavanagh: 0)
-
01 Win streak favours Temirov
Ramazan Temirov rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
02 KO rate favours Temirov
Ramazan Temirov finishes by KO 47% more often
-
03 Strikes absorbed favours Temirov
Ramazan Temirov eats 0.3 fewer strikes per minute
-
04 Striking volume favours Temirov
Ramazan Temirov lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
-
05 Finish rate favours Temirov
Ramazan Temirov finishes 27% more of their wins
-
06 Takedown defence favours Temirov
Ramazan Temirov stuffs 17% more incoming takedowns
- Losene Keita avoids 20% more incoming strikes
- Losene Keita has been KO'd 50% less often
- Losene Keita has been finished 50% less often
- the case against Aaron Pico lands 2.2 more sig strikes per minute
- Aaron Pico out-volumes opponents at 6.2 sig/min vs Losene Keita's 3.9
-
01 Striking volume favours Pico
Aaron Pico lands 2.2 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Pico
Aaron Pico eats 0.9 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Takedown volume favours Pico
Aaron Pico hits 0.44 more takedowns per minute
-
04 Striking defence favours Keita
Losene Keita avoids 20% more incoming strikes
-
05 KO durability favours Keita
Losene Keita has been KO'd 50% less often
-
06 Durability favours Keita
Losene Keita has been finished 50% less often
- Alexander Volkov lands 1.3 more sig strikes per minute
- Alexander Volkov finishes 14% more of their wins
- Alexander Volkov is 10% more accurate on the feet
- the case against Rizvan Kuniev eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Alexander Volkov has a 16-fight UFC experience edge (19 vs 3)
-
01 Striking volume favours Volkov
Alexander Volkov lands 1.3 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Kuniev
Rizvan Kuniev eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Takedown defence favours Kuniev
Rizvan Kuniev stuffs 23% more incoming takedowns
-
04 Finish rate favours Volkov
Alexander Volkov finishes 14% more of their wins
-
05 Striking accuracy favours Volkov
Alexander Volkov is 10% more accurate on the feet
-
06 Striking defence favours Volkov
Alexander Volkov avoids 7% more incoming strikes
- Dominick Reyes lands 0.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Dominick Reyes rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- Dominick Reyes taps opponents 7% more often
- the case against Azamat Murzakanov finishes by KO 19% more often
- Azamat Murzakanov KOs 86% of opponents — Dominick Reyes has been KO'd in 27% of losses
-
01 Striking volume favours Reyes
Dominick Reyes lands 0.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Reyes
Dominick Reyes rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
03 KO rate favours Murzakanov
Azamat Murzakanov finishes by KO 19% more often
-
04 Strikes absorbed favours Murzakanov
Azamat Murzakanov eats 0.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
05 Finish rate favours Murzakanov
Azamat Murzakanov finishes 12% more of their wins
-
06 Submission rate favours Reyes
Dominick Reyes taps opponents 7% more often
- Cam Rowston eats 1.4 fewer strikes per minute
- Cam Rowston lands 2.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Cam Rowston rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- the case against Abus Magomedov taps opponents 25% more often
- Cam Rowston out-volumes opponents at 5.5 sig/min vs Abus Magomedov's 3.1
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Rowston
Cam Rowston eats 1.4 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Rowston
Cam Rowston lands 2.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Rowston
Cam Rowston rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
04 KO rate favours Rowston
Cam Rowston finishes by KO 42% more often
-
05 Submission rate favours Magomedov
Abus Magomedov taps opponents 25% more often
-
06 Control time favours Rowston
Cam Rowston controls 22% more cage time
- Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev eats 0.7 fewer strikes per minute
- Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev hits 0.62 more takedowns per minute
- Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev rides a 3-fight win streak (Nikita Krylov: 0)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Yakhyaev
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev eats 0.7 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Yakhyaev
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
03 Takedown volume favours Yakhyaev
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev hits 0.62 more takedowns per minute
-
04 Submission rate favours Yakhyaev
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev taps opponents 44% more often
-
05 Striking volume favours Yakhyaev
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev lands 0.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 Finish rate favours Yakhyaev
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev finishes 18% more of their wins
- Nurullo Aliev rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Nurullo Aliev eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
- the case against Grant Dawson finishes 60% more of their wins
- Nurullo Aliev rides a 4-fight win streak (Grant Dawson: 1)
-
01 Win streak favours Aliev
Nurullo Aliev rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Aliev
Nurullo Aliev eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Dawson
Grant Dawson finishes 60% more of their wins
-
04 Striking volume favours Dawson
Grant Dawson lands 1.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
05 Submission rate favours Dawson
Grant Dawson taps opponents 33% more often
-
06 KO rate favours Dawson
Grant Dawson finishes by KO 27% more often
UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan
- Tom Nolan rides a 4-fight longer win streak
- Tom Nolan lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
- the case against Renato Moicano eats 0.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Tom Nolan rides a 5-fight win streak (Renato Moicano: 1)
-
01 Win streak favours Nolan
Tom Nolan rides a 4-fight longer win streak
-
02 Striking volume favours Nolan
Tom Nolan lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Strikes absorbed favours Moicano
Renato Moicano eats 0.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
04 Finish rate favours Moicano
Renato Moicano finishes 20% more of their wins
-
05 Submission rate favours Moicano
Renato Moicano taps opponents 18% more often
-
06 Striking defence favours Moicano
Renato Moicano avoids 11% more incoming strikes
- Lucia Szabova comes in on a 2-fight cleaner skid
- Model uncertainty: ±5pp on the win probability
-
01 Loss streak favours Szabova
Lucia Szabova comes in on a 2-fight cleaner skid
- Joe Kropschot comes in on a 2-fight cleaner skid
- Model uncertainty: ±6pp on the win probability
-
01 Loss streak favours Kropschot
Joe Kropschot comes in on a 2-fight cleaner skid
UFC Fight Night: Bonfim vs. Brady
- Gabriel Bonfim rides a 4-fight longer win streak
- Gabriel Bonfim lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
- Gabriel Bonfim finishes 8% more of their wins
- the case against Sean Brady eats 0.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Gabriel Bonfim rides a 5-fight win streak (Sean Brady: 1)
-
01 Win streak favours Bonfim
Gabriel Bonfim rides a 4-fight longer win streak
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Brady
Sean Brady eats 0.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Striking volume favours Bonfim
Gabriel Bonfim lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
-
04 Control time favours Brady
Sean Brady controls 33% more cage time
-
05 Finish rate favours Bonfim
Gabriel Bonfim finishes 8% more of their wins
-
06 Takedown volume favours Brady
Sean Brady hits 0.07 more takedowns per minute
UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit
- Ciryl Gane eats 3.8 fewer strikes per minute
- the case against Josh Hokit lands 4.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Josh Hokit out-volumes opponents at 10.3 sig/min vs Ciryl Gane's 5.4
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Gane
Ciryl Gane eats 3.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Hokit
Josh Hokit lands 4.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Hokit
Josh Hokit rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
04 KO rate favours Hokit
Josh Hokit finishes by KO 39% more often
-
05 Takedown defence favours Hokit
Josh Hokit stuffs 31% more incoming takedowns
-
06 Finish rate favours Hokit
Josh Hokit finishes 18% more of their wins
- Kayla Harrison eats 1.3 fewer strikes per minute
- Kayla Harrison taps opponents 50% more often
- Kayla Harrison rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- the case against Amanda Nunes finishes by KO 44% more often
- layoff Nunes hasn't fought since Jun 2023 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Amanda Nunes has a 15-fight UFC experience edge (18 vs 3)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Harrison
Kayla Harrison eats 1.3 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 KO rate favours Nunes
Amanda Nunes finishes by KO 44% more often
-
03 Submission rate favours Harrison
Kayla Harrison taps opponents 50% more often
-
04 Win streak favours Harrison
Kayla Harrison rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
05 Striking volume favours Nunes
Amanda Nunes lands 0.2 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 Takedown defence favours Harrison
Kayla Harrison stuffs 19% more incoming takedowns
- Yousri Belgaroui lands 5.0 more sig strikes per minute
- Yousri Belgaroui eats 0.7 fewer strikes per minute
- Yousri Belgaroui finishes 78% more of their wins
- the case against Caio Borralho stuffs 17% more incoming takedowns
- Yousri Belgaroui out-volumes opponents at 8.3 sig/min vs Caio Borralho's 3.3
-
01 Striking volume favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui lands 5.0 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui eats 0.7 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui finishes 78% more of their wins
-
04 KO rate favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui finishes by KO 89% more often
-
05 Win streak favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
06 Takedown defence favours Borralho
Caio Borralho stuffs 17% more incoming takedowns
- Kevin Holland eats 0.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Kevin Holland taps opponents 21% more often
- the case against Uros Medic rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Uros Medic rides a 4-fight win streak (Kevin Holland: 1)
-
01 Win streak favours Medic
Uros Medic rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
02 Striking volume favours Medic
Uros Medic lands 1.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 KO rate favours Medic
Uros Medic finishes by KO 58% more often
-
04 Finish rate favours Medic
Uros Medic finishes 45% more of their wins
-
05 Strikes absorbed favours Holland
Kevin Holland eats 0.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
06 Submission rate favours Holland
Kevin Holland taps opponents 21% more often
- Bilal Hasan eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Bilal Hasan finishes by KO 56% more often
- Bilal Hasan finishes 36% more of their wins
- Bilal Hasan has never been finished in 1 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 KO rate favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan finishes by KO 56% more often
-
03 Finish rate favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan finishes 36% more of their wins
-
04 Win streak favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
05 Striking volume favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan lands 0.4 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 Durability favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan has been finished 40% less often
- Charles Radtke eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Charles Radtke rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- Charles Radtke finishes 31% more of their wins
- the case against Stephen Thompson lands 1.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Stephen Thompson out-volumes opponents at 4.0 sig/min vs Charles Radtke's 2.5
-
01 Striking volume favours Thompson
Stephen Thompson lands 1.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Radtke
Charles Radtke eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Radtke
Charles Radtke rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
04 Finish rate favours Radtke
Charles Radtke finishes 31% more of their wins
-
05 Takedown defence favours Radtke
Charles Radtke stuffs 37% more incoming takedowns
-
06 KO rate favours Radtke
Charles Radtke finishes by KO 21% more often
- Chris Duncan taps opponents 34% more often
- Chris Duncan hits 0.15 more takedowns per minute
- Chris Duncan eats 0.1 fewer strikes per minute
- the case against Drew Dober rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- Drew Dober has never been finished in 27 fights
-
01 Win streak favours Dober
Drew Dober rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
02 KO rate favours Dober
Drew Dober finishes by KO 52% more often
-
03 Submission rate favours Duncan
Chris Duncan taps opponents 34% more often
-
04 Takedown volume favours Duncan
Chris Duncan hits 0.15 more takedowns per minute
-
05 Strikes absorbed favours Duncan
Chris Duncan eats 0.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
06 Finish rate favours Dober
Drew Dober finishes 8% more of their wins
- Terrance McKinney lands 4.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Terrance McKinney finishes 47% more of their wins
- Terrance McKinney finishes by KO 47% more often
- the case against Jim Miller eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Terrance McKinney out-volumes opponents at 7.8 sig/min vs Jim Miller's 2.9
-
01 Striking volume favours McKinney
Terrance McKinney lands 4.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Miller
Jim Miller eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours McKinney
Terrance McKinney finishes 47% more of their wins
-
04 KO rate favours McKinney
Terrance McKinney finishes by KO 47% more often
-
05 Win streak favours Miller
Jim Miller rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
06 Takedown defence favours McKinney
Terrance McKinney stuffs 25% more incoming takedowns
- Baisangur Susurkaev lands 3.1 more sig strikes per minute
- Baisangur Susurkaev finishes 33% more of their wins
- Baisangur Susurkaev taps opponents 33% more often
- the case against Donte Johnson eats 2.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Baisangur Susurkaev out-volumes opponents at 6.0 sig/min vs Donte Johnson's 2.9
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Johnson
Donte Johnson eats 2.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev lands 3.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev finishes 33% more of their wins
-
04 Submission rate favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev taps opponents 33% more often
-
05 Takedown defence favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev stuffs 23% more incoming takedowns
-
06 Striking accuracy favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev is 11% more accurate on the feet
- Bia Mesquita eats 1.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Bia Mesquita rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Bia Mesquita lands 1.3 more sig strikes per minute
- the case against Macy Chiasson stuffs 62% more incoming takedowns
- Bia Mesquita rides a 3-fight win streak (Macy Chiasson: 0)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita eats 1.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
03 Striking volume favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita lands 1.3 more sig strikes per minute
-
04 Submission rate favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita taps opponents 86% more often
-
05 Finish rate favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita finishes 50% more of their wins
-
06 Takedown defence favours Chiasson
Macy Chiasson stuffs 62% more incoming takedowns
- Juan Diaz eats 3.6 fewer strikes per minute
- Juan Diaz taps opponents 100% more often
- Juan Diaz hits 0.55 more takedowns per minute
- the case against Adrian Yanez lands 4.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Adrian Yanez out-volumes opponents at 5.9 sig/min vs Juan Diaz's 1.4
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Diaz
Juan Diaz eats 3.6 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Yanez
Adrian Yanez lands 4.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Submission rate favours Diaz
Juan Diaz taps opponents 100% more often
-
04 KO rate favours Yanez
Adrian Yanez finishes by KO 73% more often
-
05 Takedown volume favours Diaz
Juan Diaz hits 0.55 more takedowns per minute
-
06 Finish rate favours Diaz
Juan Diaz finishes 27% more of their wins
- Nazim Sadykhov lands 2.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Nazim Sadykhov has been KO'd 71% less often
- Nazim Sadykhov has been finished 71% less often
- the case against Jefferson Nascimento eats 3.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Nazim Sadykhov out-volumes opponents at 4.7 sig/min vs Jefferson Nascimento's 1.8
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Nascimento
Jefferson Nascimento eats 3.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov lands 2.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 KO durability favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov has been KO'd 71% less often
-
04 Durability favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov has been finished 71% less often
-
05 Submission rate favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov taps opponents 14% more often
-
06 Finish rate favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov finishes 10% more of their wins
Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 8
Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 9
Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 10
UFC 335
UFC 331: Van vs. Pantoja 2 8/12 · 67%
2026-09-19Actual Fight Stats
| Alexandre Pantoja | Joshua Van | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 147/284 | 181/305 |
| Total strikes landed | 159 | 259 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 5/18 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Joshua Van wins value | 74% | 1.64 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Joshua Van wins by KO/TKO | 43% | 2.70 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 2 | 24% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Arman Tsarukyan | Mauricio Ruffy | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 8/19 | 4/10 |
| Total strikes landed | 9 | 22 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 1/10 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Arman Tsarukyan wins | 78% | 1.32 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Arman Tsarukyan wins by KO/TKO | 33% | 3.30 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 23% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Patricio Pitbull | Dooho Choi | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 38/75 | 20/46 |
| Total strikes landed | 38 | 20 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Dooho Choi wins value | 90% | 1.34 | missed |
| Method Dooho Choi wins by Decision value | 62% | 2.85 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 69% | 1.94 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Gable Steveson | Sean Sharaf | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 1/2 | 3/6 |
| Total strikes landed | 1 | 3 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Gable Steveson wins | 93% | 1.06 | missed |
| Method Gable Steveson wins by KO/TKO | 77% | 1.25 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 49% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Alonzo Menifield | Iwo Baraniewski | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 62/162 | 67/121 |
| Total strikes landed | 140 | 89 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 1/5 | 1/3 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Iwo Baraniewski wins | 73% | 1.32 | missed |
| Method Iwo Baraniewski wins by KO/TKO | 57% | 1.67 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 45% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Marlon Vera | Charles Jourdain | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 72/128 | 83/127 |
| Total strikes landed | 80 | 108 |
| Knockdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 3/3 | 0/1 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Charles Jourdain wins value | 66% | 4.00 | missed |
| Method Charles Jourdain wins by Decision value | 37% | 5.10 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 54% | 4.00 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Tai Tuivasa | Robelis Despaigne | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 31/68 | 30/69 |
| Total strikes landed | 54 | 83 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 1/6 | 2/2 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Robelis Despaigne wins | 61% | 1.22 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Robelis Despaigne wins by KO/TKO | 39% | 1.37 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 35% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Michael Aswell Jr. | JooSang Yoo | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 70/145 | 46/129 |
| Total strikes landed | 93 | 51 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/1 | 1/4 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Michael Aswell Jr. wins | 58% | 1.60 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Michael Aswell Jr. wins by KO/TKO value | 32% | 9.25 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 26% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Ozzy Diaz | Ryan Gandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 3/4 | 16/34 |
| Total strikes landed | 3 | 16 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Ryan Gandra wins | 72% | 1.20 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Ryan Gandra wins by KO/TKO | 35% | 1.40 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 30% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Edmen Shahbazyan | Brunno Ferreira | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 61/110 | 32/108 |
| Total strikes landed | 63 | 33 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 1/3 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Edmen Shahbazyan wins | 78% | 1.20 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Edmen Shahbazyan wins by KO/TKO value | 49% | 3.80 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 44% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Casey O'Neill | Eduarda Moura | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 1/4 | 3/7 |
| Total strikes landed | 1 | 13 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Casey O'Neill wins | 66% | 1.42 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Casey O'Neill wins by Decision | 38% | 2.18 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 68% | 1.52 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Giga Chikadze | Joanderson Brito | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 7/12 | 20/27 |
| Total strikes landed | 13 | 24 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Joanderson Brito wins | 62% | 1.22 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Joanderson Brito wins by Decision | 34% | 3.90 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 53% | 2.61 | missed |
Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 6
2026-09-15Noche UFC: Silva vs. Delgado 8/12 · 67%
2026-09-12Actual Fight Stats
| Jean Silva | Jose Miguel Delgado | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 39/77 | 40/108 |
| Total strikes landed | 40 | 41 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 1/2 | 0/1 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Control time | 1:37 | 0:21 |
Actual Fight Stats
| Brandon Moreno | Joseph Morales | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 67/180 | 71/183 |
| Total strikes landed | 71 | 77 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 2/2 | 1/8 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 2:34 | 0:35 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Brandon Moreno wins | 52% | 1.96 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Brandon Moreno wins by Decision | 23% | 2.65 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 61% | 3.02 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Tommy McMillen | Marwan Rahiki | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 89/237 | 79/178 |
| Total strikes landed | 128 | 80 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 5/5 | 1/2 |
| Submission attempts | 3 | 0 |
| Control time | 4:53 | 0:07 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Tommy McMillen wins | 52% | 1.58 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Tommy McMillen wins by Decision | 31% | 4.20 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 39% | 2.83 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Alexa Grasso | Manon Fiorot | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 80/196 | 72/226 |
| Total strikes landed | 96 | 73 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:57 | 0:02 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Manon Fiorot wins | 66% | 1.35 | missed |
| Method Manon Fiorot wins by Decision | 47% | 1.69 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 76% | 1.25 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Curtis Blaydes | Waldo Cortes Acosta | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 24/74 | 28/95 |
| Total strikes landed | 32 | 30 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 4/10 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 3:38 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Waldo Cortes Acosta wins value | 65% | 3.75 | missed |
| Method Waldo Cortes Acosta wins by KO/TKO value | 39% | 5.10 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 25% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Dan Ige | David Martinez | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 27/124 | 52/139 |
| Total strikes landed | 27 | 58 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:05 | 0:19 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Dan Ige wins value | 20% | 7.75 | missed |
| Method Dan Ige wins by Decision | 13% | 19.00 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 62% | 3.45 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Tim Elliott | Édgar Cháirez | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 64/204 | 58/124 |
| Total strikes landed | 142 | 70 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 5/11 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Control time | 5:54 | 0:04 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Édgar Cháirez wins value | 70% | 4.00 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 54% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Muslim Salikhov | Ignacio Bahamondes | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 42/97 | 78/160 |
| Total strikes landed | 44 | 91 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 3/8 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 1:16 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Ignacio Bahamondes wins | 75% | 1.11 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Ignacio Bahamondes wins by KO/TKO | 47% | 2.45 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 33% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Yousri Belgaroui | Djorden Santos | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 46/81 | 16/48 |
| Total strikes landed | 46 | 16 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Yousri Belgaroui wins | 84% | 1.10 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Yousri Belgaroui wins by KO/TKO | 42% | 1.70 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 30% | 3.05 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Drakkar Klose | Tommy Gantt | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 15/30 | 56/82 |
| Total strikes landed | 87 | 95 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 2/8 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Control time | 0:21 | 9:55 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Tommy Gantt wins | 78% | 1.25 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Tommy Gantt wins by KO/TKO | 40% | 2.70 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 31% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Rafa Garcia | Rongzhu | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 73/189 | 109/247 |
| Total strikes landed | 77 | 110 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 1/9 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 1:15 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Rafa Garcia wins value | 56% | 9.00 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 57% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Jessie Rosas | Sean King III | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 3/6 | 7/13 |
| Total strikes landed | 3 | 7 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 1/1 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:04 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Sean King III wins | 59% | 1.40 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Sean King III wins by Decision | 29% | 3.10 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 49% | 2.55 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| JJ Aldrich | Regina Tarin | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 63/118 | 77/190 |
| Total strikes landed | 74 | 87 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/4 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:41 | 0:09 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Regina Tarin wins | 68% | 1.32 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Regina Tarin wins by Decision | 50% | 1.94 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 73% | 1.35 | ✓ predicted |
Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 5 2/5 · 40%
2026-09-08UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs. Parnasse 6/14 · 43%
2026-09-05Actual Fight Stats
| Dan Hooker | Salahdine Parnasse | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 14/31 | 12/17 |
| Total strikes landed | 14 | 12 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:02 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Dan Hooker wins value | 75% | 4.90 | missed |
| Method Dan Hooker wins by KO/TKO value | 30% | 9.50 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 31% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Farés Ziam | Axel Sola | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 7/13 | 9/13 |
| Total strikes landed | 7 | 9 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:02 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Farés Ziam wins | 56% | 1.64 | missed |
| Method Farés Ziam wins by Decision | 40% | 2.60 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 60% | 2.36 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Michael Page | Nursulton Ruziboev | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 12/28 | 8/29 |
| Total strikes landed | 49 | 21 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/2 | 2/3 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Control time | 1:06 | 5:28 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Michael Page wins | 56% | 1.46 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Michael Page wins by Decision | 27% | 2.30 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 41% | 2.03 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Punahele Soriano | Daniil Donchenko | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 15/84 | 83/137 |
| Total strikes landed | 43 | 120 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 4/11 | 0/1 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Control time | 3:32 | 0:41 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Daniil Donchenko wins | 73% | 1.42 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Daniil Donchenko wins by KO/TKO | 40% | 2.15 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 29% | 2.95 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Trevor Peek | Kurtis Campbell | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 12/35 | 44/61 |
| Total strikes landed | 17 | 79 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 13/24 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 10:20 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Kurtis Campbell wins | 53% | 1.23 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Kurtis Campbell wins by Decision value | 43% | 3.50 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 67% | 2.64 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Muhammad Naimov | Losene Keita | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 4/24 | 18/30 |
| Total strikes landed | 4 | 19 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:20 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Losene Keita wins | 74% | 1.24 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Losene Keita wins by Decision value | 41% | 3.75 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 57% | 2.56 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Morgan Charrière | Felipe Lima | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 36/146 | 112/218 |
| Total strikes landed | 38 | 115 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/3 | 2/2 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:31 | 0:13 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Felipe Lima wins value | 77% | 1.45 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Felipe Lima wins by Decision | 44% | 2.30 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 54% | 2.21 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Ryan Spann | Mario Pinto | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 13/34 | 48/67 |
| Total strikes landed | 16 | 114 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/1 | 6/7 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:20 | 3:33 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Mario Pinto wins value | 96% | 1.27 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Mario Pinto wins by KO/TKO | 48% | 1.85 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 35% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Modestas Bukauskas | Oumar Sy | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 22/46 | 39/59 |
| Total strikes landed | 29 | 48 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 3/8 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Control time | 1:35 | 5:08 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Oumar Sy wins | 70% | 1.40 | missed |
| Method Oumar Sy wins by Decision | 36% | 2.55 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 48% | 2.00 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Nathaniel Wood | Pavel Andrusca | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 28/86 | 50/105 |
| Total strikes landed | 57 | 69 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 4/19 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Control time | 0:09 | 6:06 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Nathaniel Wood wins | 75% | 1.32 | missed |
| Method Nathaniel Wood wins by Decision | 29% | 2.07 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 49% | 2.11 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Michael Aljarouj | Fabia Sintes | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 10/32 | 28/49 |
| Total strikes landed | 70 | 61 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/3 | 3/8 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 3 |
| Control time | 4:24 | 6:19 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Michael Aljarouj wins value | 58% | 15.00 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 52% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Nora Cornolle | Klaudia Syguła | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 34/63 | 23/64 |
| Total strikes landed | 60 | 103 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 4/7 | 0/1 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Control time | 8:59 | 3:15 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Klaudia Syguła wins value | 52% | 3.10 | missed |
| Method Klaudia Syguła wins by Decision | 31% | 4.00 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 57% | 3.80 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Luis Felipe Dias | Matthieu Duclos | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 22/50 | 18/43 |
| Total strikes landed | 23 | 20 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:33 | 0:05 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Luis Felipe Dias wins value | 76% | 1.97 | missed |
| Method Luis Felipe Dias wins by KO/TKO value | 50% | 4.10 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 37% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Luis Felipe Dias | Matthieu Letho Duclos | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 22/50 | 18/43 |
| Total strikes landed | 23 | 20 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:33 | 0:05 |
Actual Fight Stats
| Sofia Montenegro | Delphine Benouaich | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 72/197 | 146/249 |
| Total strikes landed | 72 | 154 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 1:41 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Sofia Montenegro wins value | 57% | 2.10 | missed |
| Method Sofia Montenegro wins by Decision | 31% | 3.20 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 54% | 2.60 | missed |
Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 4 5/5 · 100%
2026-09-01UFC Fight Night: Nurmagomedov vs. Song 10/13 · 77%
2026-08-29Actual Fight Stats
| Song Yadong | Umar Nurmagomedov | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 11/23 | 13/21 |
| Total strikes landed | 24 | 23 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 1/3 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:02 | 1:58 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Umar Nurmagomedov wins | 80% | 1.14 | missed |
| Method Umar Nurmagomedov wins by Decision | 53% | 1.69 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 61% | 1.53 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Yan Xiaonan | Denise Gomes | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 19/59 | 18/48 |
| Total strikes landed | 19 | 20 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Denise Gomes wins value | 69% | 2.25 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Denise Gomes wins by Decision value | 37% | 3.90 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 59% | 2.95 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Kai Asakura | Aoriqileng | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 27/50 | 14/28 |
| Total strikes landed | 29 | 18 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/1 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:39 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Kai Asakura wins | 69% | 1.21 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Kai Asakura wins by Decision value | 38% | 5.50 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 53% | 3.32 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Alex Perez | Sumudaerji | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 10/43 | 41/80 |
| Total strikes landed | 52 | 85 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 4/8 | 0/2 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 7:20 | 0:14 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Sumudaerji wins | 64% | 1.45 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Sumudaerji wins by Decision value | 45% | 3.05 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 61% | 2.23 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Liu Ce | Levi Rodrigues Jr. | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 59/82 | 28/57 |
| Total strikes landed | 60 | 28 |
| Knockdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/2 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:04 | 0:44 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Liu Ce wins value | 70% | 1.57 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Liu Ce wins by KO/TKO | 42% | 1.86 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Finish in Round 1 | 45% | — | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Bilal Hasan | Nilson Rojas | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 53/129 | 33/66 |
| Total strikes landed | 56 | 37 |
| Knockdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 1/1 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 1:03 | 0:03 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Bilal Hasan wins | 57% | 1.85 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 65% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Namsrai Batbayar | Andre Lima | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 51/141 | 47/77 |
| Total strikes landed | 51 | 47 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/1 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Control time | 0:08 | 0:13 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Andre Lima wins | 79% | 1.08 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 60% | — | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Rei Tsuruya | Kevin Borjas | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 39/67 | 0/0 |
| Total strikes landed | 71 | 1 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 2/4 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Control time | 3:58 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Rei Tsuruya wins | 81% | 1.12 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Rei Tsuruya wins by Decision value | 39% | 3.50 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 50% | 2.74 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Sean Woodson | Jack Jenkins | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 58/129 | 43/95 |
| Total strikes landed | 130 | 72 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/2 | 0/5 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Control time | 1:11 | 4:47 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Sean Woodson wins | 70% | 1.23 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Sean Woodson wins by Decision | 43% | 1.75 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 66% | 1.42 | ✓ predicted |
Actual Fight Stats
| Xiao Long | Francesco Nuzzi | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 4/7 | 11/20 |
| Total strikes landed | 4 | 12 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:02 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Xiao Long wins | 59% | 1.51 | missed |
| Method Xiao Long wins by KO/TKO value | 26% | 6.00 | missed |
| Finish round Finish in Round 3 | 23% | 7.25 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Lawrence Lui | Hector Santiago | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 32/59 | 30/111 |
| Total strikes landed | 32 | 32 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/1 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:01 | 0:07 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Lawrence Lui wins | 77% | 1.25 | missed |
| Method Lawrence Lui wins by Decision value | 52% | 2.90 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 64% | 2.20 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Jingnan Xiong | Julia Polastri | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 16/42 | 16/25 |
| Total strikes landed | 16 | 16 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 0:00 | 0:00 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Julia Polastri wins value | 99% | 1.43 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Julia Polastri wins by Decision | 63% | 1.78 | missed |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 63% | 3.45 | missed |
Actual Fight Stats
| Ding Meng | Cam Nelson | |
|---|---|---|
| Sig. strikes (landed/att) | 39/79 | 41/70 |
| Total strikes landed | 72 | 47 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Takedowns (landed/att) | 0/1 | 4/11 |
| Submission attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Control time | 1:10 | 6:34 |
| Outcome | Model prob | Odds | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner Cam Nelson wins value | 60% | 2.23 | ✓ predicted |
| Method Cam Nelson wins by Decision value | 42% | 4.90 | ✓ predicted |
| Finish round Goes the distance | 55% | 2.56 | ✓ predicted |