New here? How to read these predictions
- Win probability
- Our model's estimate that a fighter wins — e.g. 72% means we'd expect them to win roughly 7 of 10 times.
- Confidence interval (CI)
- The range the true probability likely falls in. Wider = less certain. A pick'em fight has a wide band; a clear favourite a narrow one.
- Edge
- How much higher our probability is than the bookmaker's implied odds. Positive edge = we think it's underpriced.
- EV (expected value)
- Average return if you placed the bet many times. +15% EV means about 15c profit per $1 staked, on average.
- Risk tiers
- Conservative leans to safe favourites, Balanced blends, Aggressive chases bigger-odds longshots. Pick what suits you.
- Edge badges
- Strong / Solid / Slight edge rank how much value the model sees — and how big a stake it suggests. They're not a promise the bet wins.
Tap any fight row to open the full model breakdown. New to the model itself? How it works · FAQ.
UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs. Parnasse
- the case against Salahdine Parnasse comes in on a 2-fight cleaner skid
- Dan Hooker out-volumes opponents at 4.8 sig/min vs Salahdine Parnasse's 0.0
-
01 Loss streak favours Parnasse
Salahdine Parnasse comes in on a 2-fight cleaner skid
- Michael Page eats 1.1 fewer strikes per minute
- Michael Page stuffs 35% more incoming takedowns
- the case against Nursulton Ruziboev finishes 67% more of their wins
- Nursulton Ruziboev has never been finished in 6 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Page
Michael Page eats 1.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Finish rate favours Ruziboev
Nursulton Ruziboev finishes 67% more of their wins
-
03 KO rate favours Ruziboev
Nursulton Ruziboev finishes by KO 50% more often
-
04 Takedown defence favours Page
Michael Page stuffs 35% more incoming takedowns
-
05 Submission rate favours Ruziboev
Nursulton Ruziboev taps opponents 17% more often
-
06 Striking volume favours Ruziboev
Nursulton Ruziboev lands 0.2 more sig strikes per minute
- Kurtis Campbell finishes 56% more of their wins
- Kurtis Campbell finishes by KO 56% more often
- Kurtis Campbell eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
- the case against Trevor Peek lands 1.7 more sig strikes per minute
- layoff Peek hasn't fought since Sep 2024 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Trevor Peek out-volumes opponents at 4.1 sig/min vs Kurtis Campbell's 2.3
-
01 Striking volume favours Peek
Trevor Peek lands 1.7 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Finish rate favours Campbell
Kurtis Campbell finishes 56% more of their wins
-
03 KO rate favours Campbell
Kurtis Campbell finishes by KO 56% more often
-
04 Strikes absorbed favours Campbell
Kurtis Campbell eats 0.4 fewer strikes per minute
-
05 Takedown defence favours Peek
Trevor Peek stuffs 53% more incoming takedowns
-
06 Durability favours Peek
Trevor Peek has been finished 100% less often
- Mario Pinto eats 2.0 fewer strikes per minute
- Mario Pinto rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- Mario Pinto is 27% more accurate on the feet
- the case against Ryan Spann lands 0.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Ryan Spann has a 13-fight UFC experience edge (16 vs 3)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Pinto
Mario Pinto eats 2.0 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Pinto
Mario Pinto rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
03 Striking accuracy favours Pinto
Mario Pinto is 27% more accurate on the feet
-
04 Takedown defence favours Pinto
Mario Pinto stuffs 42% more incoming takedowns
-
05 Striking volume favours Spann
Ryan Spann lands 0.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 KO rate favours Pinto
Mario Pinto finishes by KO 23% more often
The matrix has identified no value yet — SportsBet odds may not be published.