New here? How to read these predictions
- Win probability
- Our model's estimate that a fighter wins — e.g. 72% means we'd expect them to win roughly 7 of 10 times.
- Confidence interval (CI)
- The range the true probability likely falls in. Wider = less certain. A pick'em fight has a wide band; a clear favourite a narrow one.
- Edge
- How much higher our probability is than the bookmaker's implied odds. Positive edge = we think it's underpriced.
- EV (expected value)
- Average return if you placed the bet many times. +15% EV means about 15c profit per $1 staked, on average.
- Risk tiers
- Conservative leans to safe favourites, Balanced blends, Aggressive chases bigger-odds longshots. Pick what suits you.
- Edge badges
- Strong / Solid / Slight edge rank how much value the model sees — and how big a stake it suggests. They're not a promise the bet wins.
Tap any fight row to open the full model breakdown. New to the model itself? How it works · FAQ.
UFC Fight Night: Kape vs. Horiguchi
- Kyoji Horiguchi eats 2.0 fewer strikes per minute
- Kyoji Horiguchi rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- Manel Kape lands 1.3 more sig strikes per minute
- Kyoji Horiguchi rides a 5-fight win streak (Manel Kape: 3)
- Manel Kape has never been finished in 10 fights
-
Sig strikes10–94 9–81
- Sig strikes (combined) 111 22–203
-
Takedowns0.0–2.3 0.0–1.8
- Takedowns (combined) 1.3 0.0–4.4
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Horiguchi
Kyoji Horiguchi eats 2.0 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Horiguchi
Kyoji Horiguchi rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
03 Striking volume favours Kape
Manel Kape lands 1.3 more sig strikes per minute
-
04 KO rate favours Kape
Manel Kape finishes by KO 30% more often
-
05 Finish rate favours Kape
Manel Kape finishes 10% more of their wins
-
06 Takedown volume favours Horiguchi
Kyoji Horiguchi hits 0.08 more takedowns per minute
-
Kyoji Horiguchi wins by KO/TKO in R1, R2 or R3Strong edgeModel 16%Bookies 7%EV / $100 +$139Stake 2.5%15.00$25 returns $375+$350 profit
-
Kyoji Horiguchi wins by KO/TKO in R1Solid edgeModel 6%Bookies 3%EV / $100 +$120Stake 0.9%34.00$9 returns $306+$297 profit
-
Kyoji Horiguchi wins by KO/TKOStrong edgeModel 19%Bookies 9%EV / $100 +$119Stake 2.8%11.50$28 returns $322+$294 profit
-
Kyoji Horiguchi wins by KO/TKO in R2, R3 or R4Solid edgeModel 12%Bookies 6%EV / $100 +$111Stake 1.6%18.00$16 returns $288+$272 profit
-
Kyoji Horiguchi wins by KO or DecisionStrong edgeModel 43%Bookies 34%EV / $100 +$28Stake 3.5%2.95$35 returns $103+$68 profit
-
Kyoji Horiguchi wins by KO or SubSolid edgeModel 23%Bookies 19%EV / $100 +$22Stake 1.2%5.40$12 returns $65+$53 profit
-
Finish before Round 4Strong edgeModel 43%Bookies 38%EV / $100 +$16Stake 2.3%2.66$23 returns $61+$38 profit
-
Kyoji Horiguchi winsSolid edgeModel 47%Bookies 43%EV / $100 +$10Stake 1.8%2.35$18 returns $42+$24 profit
- Navajo Stirling rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Navajo Stirling lands 1.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Navajo Stirling eats 0.7 fewer strikes per minute
- Navajo Stirling rides a 4-fight win streak (Ion Cutelaba: 1)
- Navajo Stirling out-volumes opponents at 6.1 sig/min vs Ion Cutelaba's 4.2
-
Sig strikes8–71 9–78
- Sig strikes (combined) 86 18–147
-
Takedowns0.0–2.9 0.0–2.0
- Takedowns (combined) 1.5 0.0–4.9
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Win streak favours Stirling
Navajo Stirling rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
02 Striking volume favours Stirling
Navajo Stirling lands 1.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Strikes absorbed favours Stirling
Navajo Stirling eats 0.7 fewer strikes per minute
-
04 Finish rate favours Cutelaba
Ion Cutelaba finishes 40% more of their wins
-
05 Takedown volume favours Cutelaba
Ion Cutelaba hits 0.18 more takedowns per minute
-
06 KO rate favours Cutelaba
Ion Cutelaba finishes by KO 10% more often
-
Navajo Stirling wins by KO/TKO in R1 or R2Strong edgeModel 43%Bookies 34%EV / $100 +$24Stake 3.1%2.90$32 returns $93+$61 profit
-
Navajo Stirling wins by KO/TKO in R1Solid edgeModel 26%Bookies 22%EV / $100 +$21Stake 1.4%4.60$14 returns $64+$50 profit
-
Navajo Stirling wins by KO/TKOStrong edgeModel 51%Bookies 43%EV / $100 +$18Stake 3.5%2.30$34 returns $78+$44 profit
-
Fight ends by KO/TKOStrong edgeModel 60%Bookies 54%EV / $100 +$10Stake 3.1%1.84$31 returns $57+$26 profit
- Vinicius Oliveira eats 1.6 fewer strikes per minute
- Vinicius Oliveira lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
- Andre Fili hits 0.05 more takedowns per minute
- Andre Fili has a 21-fight UFC experience edge (26 vs 5)
- Andre Fili has never been finished in 26 fights
-
Sig strikes9–71 10–96
- Sig strikes (combined) 104 22–159
-
Takedowns0.0–3.1 0.0–2.5
- Takedowns (combined) 1.6 0.0–5.5
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Oliveira
Vinicius Oliveira eats 1.6 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Oliveira
Vinicius Oliveira lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Takedown volume favours Fili
Andre Fili hits 0.05 more takedowns per minute
-
04 KO rate favours Fili
Andre Fili finishes by KO 7% more often
-
05 Striking accuracy favours Oliveira
Vinicius Oliveira is 5% more accurate on the feet
-
06 Striking defence favours Oliveira
Vinicius Oliveira avoids 6% more incoming strikes
-
Vinicius Oliveira wins by DecisionStrong edgeModel 49%Bookies 31%EV / $100 +$58Stake 6.6%3.20$66 returns $211+$145 profit
-
Vinicius Oliveira wins by DECStrong edgeModel 49%Bookies 32%EV / $100 +$56Stake 6.5%3.15$65 returns $205+$140 profit
-
Fight goes to decisionStrong edgeModel 69%Bookies 48%EV / $100 +$43Stake 9.9%2.08$99 returns $206+$107 profit
-
Fight goes to DecisionStrong edgeModel 69%Bookies 49%EV / $100 +$41Stake 9.7%2.05$97 returns $199+$102 profit
-
Vinicius Oliveira wins by Sub or DecisionStrong edgeModel 54%Bookies 42%EV / $100 +$29Stake 5.2%2.40$52 returns $125+$73 profit
-
Over 2.5 roundsStrong edgeModel 71%Bookies 56%EV / $100 +$28Stake 8.9%1.80$89 returns $160+$71 profit
-
Fight reaches Round 3Strong edgeModel 74%Bookies 61%EV / $100 +$22Stake 8.5%1.65$85 returns $140+$55 profit
- Christian Rodriguez eats 2.1 fewer strikes per minute
- Hyder Amil lands 3.7 more sig strikes per minute
- Hyder Amil finishes by KO 60% more often
- Hyder Amil out-volumes opponents at 7.4 sig/min vs Christian Rodriguez's 3.7
- Christian Rodriguez has never been finished in 9 fights
-
Sig strikes9–88 9–81
- Sig strikes (combined) 84 21–157
-
Takedowns0.0–2.9 0.0–1.8
- Takedowns (combined) 2.0 0.0–5.0
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Rodriguez
Christian Rodriguez eats 2.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Amil
Hyder Amil lands 3.7 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 KO rate favours Amil
Hyder Amil finishes by KO 60% more often
-
04 Finish rate favours Amil
Hyder Amil finishes 38% more of their wins
-
05 Takedown defence favours Rodriguez
Christian Rodriguez stuffs 24% more incoming takedowns
-
06 Takedown volume favours Rodriguez
Christian Rodriguez hits 0.08 more takedowns per minute
- Andre Lima eats 3.9 fewer strikes per minute
- Andre Lima rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Kevin Borjas finishes by KO 40% more often
- Andre Lima rides a 3-fight win streak (Kevin Borjas: 0)
- Andre Lima has never been finished in 3 fights
-
Sig strikes8–68 10–85
- Sig strikes (combined) 90 21–143
-
Takedowns0.0–1.6 0.0–2.6
- Takedowns (combined) 1.4 0.0–4.2
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Lima
Andre Lima eats 3.9 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Lima
Andre Lima rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
03 KO rate favours Borjas
Kevin Borjas finishes by KO 40% more often
-
04 Submission rate favours Lima
Andre Lima taps opponents 33% more often
-
05 Striking volume favours Lima
Andre Lima lands 0.6 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 Striking accuracy favours Lima
Andre Lima is 16% more accurate on the feet
-
Andre Lima wins by KO/TKO in R1 or R2Solid edgeModel 26%Bookies 22%EV / $100 +$18Stake 1.3%4.60$13 returns $60+$47 profit
⏱ Sun 10:15 AM AEST
- Murtazali Magomedov comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
- Melsik Baghdasaryan out-volumes opponents at 4.5 sig/min vs Murtazali Magomedov's 0.0
- Melsik Baghdasaryan has a 5-fight UFC experience edge (5 vs 0)
-
Sig strikes6–80 7–70
- Sig strikes (combined) 71 16–159
-
Takedowns0.0–2.4 0.0–3.3
- Takedowns (combined) 1.2 0.0–4.5
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Loss streak favours Magomedov
Murtazali Magomedov comes in on a 1-fight cleaner skid
-
Melsik Baghdasaryan wins by DECSolid edgeModel 19%Bookies 12%EV / $100 +$54Stake 1.9%8.25$19 returns $157+$138 profit
-
Melsik Baghdasaryan wins by Sub or DecisionSolid edgeModel 20%Bookies 14%EV / $100 +$43Stake 1.8%7.00$18 returns $126+$108 profit
-
Melsik Baghdasaryan wins by DecisionSolid edgeModel 19%Bookies 13%EV / $100 +$40Stake 1.5%7.50$15 returns $112+$98 profit
-
Fight goes to DecisionStrong edgeModel 56%Bookies 40%EV / $100 +$39Stake 6.6%2.50$66 returns $165+$99 profit
-
Over 2.5 roundsStrong edgeModel 59%Bookies 45%EV / $100 +$30Stake 6.3%2.20$63 returns $139+$76 profit
-
Murtazali Magomedov wins by DECStrong edgeModel 37%Bookies 29%EV / $100 +$30Stake 3.0%3.50$30 returns $105+$75 profit
-
Murtazali Magomedov wins by DecisionStrong edgeModel 37%Bookies 31%EV / $100 +$21Stake 2.3%3.25$23 returns $75+$52 profit
-
Fight reaches Round 3Strong edgeModel 62%Bookies 53%EV / $100 +$17Stake 4.9%1.88$49 returns $92+$43 profit
-
Melsik Baghdasaryan winsSolid edgeModel 32%Bookies 28%EV / $100 +$13Stake 1.3%3.54$13 returns $46+$33 profit
⏱ Sun 9:35 AM AEST
- Bia Mesquita eats 3.7 fewer strikes per minute
- Bia Mesquita lands 2.1 more sig strikes per minute
- Bia Mesquita taps opponents 100% more often
- Bia Mesquita out-volumes opponents at 5.8 sig/min vs Melissa Mullins's 3.7
- Bia Mesquita has never been finished in 2 fights
-
Sig strikes6–61 7–73
- Sig strikes (combined) 61 14–136
-
Takedowns0.0–2.3 0.0–4.0
- Takedowns (combined) 2.3 0.0–4.7
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita eats 3.7 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita lands 2.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Submission rate favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita taps opponents 100% more often
-
04 Win streak favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
05 Finish rate favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita finishes 50% more of their wins
-
06 KO rate favours Mullins
Melissa Mullins finishes by KO 50% more often
- Allan Nascimento rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Allan Nascimento eats 0.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Allan Nascimento finishes 40% more of their wins
- Allan Nascimento rides a 4-fight win streak (Mitch Raposo: 1)
- Allan Nascimento has never been finished in 5 fights
-
Sig strikes7–55 8–54
- Sig strikes (combined) 57 18–115
-
Takedowns0.0–2.6 0.0–3.0
- Takedowns (combined) 1.9 0.0–5.4
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Win streak favours Nascimento
Allan Nascimento rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Nascimento
Allan Nascimento eats 0.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Nascimento
Allan Nascimento finishes 40% more of their wins
-
04 Submission rate favours Nascimento
Allan Nascimento taps opponents 40% more often
-
05 Striking volume favours Nascimento
Allan Nascimento lands 0.4 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 Takedown defence favours Raposo
Mitch Raposo stuffs 25% more incoming takedowns
⏱ Sun 8:40 AM AEST
- Gaston Bolanos eats 5.3 fewer strikes per minute
- Michael Aswell Jr. lands 2.7 more sig strikes per minute
- Gaston Bolanos finishes 18% more of their wins
- Michael Aswell Jr. out-volumes opponents at 5.8 sig/min vs Gaston Bolanos's 3.1
- Michael Aswell Jr. has never been finished in 3 fights
-
Sig strikes7–86 7–77
- Sig strikes (combined) 79 19–143
-
Takedowns0.0–1.9 0.0–2.2
- Takedowns (combined) 1.0 0.0–4.1
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Bolanos
Gaston Bolanos eats 5.3 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Jr.
Michael Aswell Jr. lands 2.7 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Bolanos
Gaston Bolanos finishes 18% more of their wins
-
04 Striking accuracy favours Bolanos
Gaston Bolanos is 12% more accurate on the feet
-
05 Durability favours Jr.
Michael Aswell Jr. has been finished 50% less often
-
06 KO rate favours Jr.
Michael Aswell Jr. finishes by KO 6% more often
- Luana Santos eats 1.7 fewer strikes per minute
- Karol Rosa lands 2.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Luana Santos finishes 50% more of their wins
- Karol Rosa out-volumes opponents at 5.9 sig/min vs Luana Santos's 3.0
- Karol Rosa has never been finished in 12 fights
-
Sig strikes7–83 9–69
- Sig strikes (combined) 97 21–136
-
Takedowns0.0–1.7 0.0–3.5
- Takedowns (combined) 2.1 0.0–4.7
- Knockdowns (combined) 0.0 0.0–0.0
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Santos
Luana Santos eats 1.7 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Rosa
Karol Rosa lands 2.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Santos
Luana Santos finishes 50% more of their wins
-
04 Win streak favours Santos
Luana Santos rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
05 Submission rate favours Santos
Luana Santos taps opponents 33% more often
-
06 KO rate favours Santos
Luana Santos finishes by KO 17% more often
-
Luana Santos winsStrong edgeModel 62%Bookies 51%EV / $100 +$22Stake 5.6%1.97$56 returns $110+$54 profit
Fighter Statistics
| Shahbazyan | Chokheli | |
|---|---|---|
| Career record | 7-1-0 | 14-3-0 |
| Last 3 win % | — | — |
| Finish rate | — | — |
| KO/TKO rate | — | — |
| Sub rate | — | — |
| Sig strikes / min ↑ | — | — |
Predicted Outcomes
Win probability and method/round breakdowns appear here once the matrix processes this card.
Tip: stats above are computed from each fighter's full UFC history. Compare KO/TKO rate vs sub rate to gauge likely method even before predictions land.
Fighter Statistics
| Tanzilovi | Collins | |
|---|---|---|
| Career record | 10-1-0 | 7-0-0 |
| Last 3 win % | — | — |
| Finish rate | — | — |
| KO/TKO rate | — | — |
| Sub rate | — | — |
| Sig strikes / min ↑ | — | — |
Predicted Outcomes
Win probability and method/round breakdowns appear here once the matrix processes this card.
Tip: stats above are computed from each fighter's full UFC history. Compare KO/TKO rate vs sub rate to gauge likely method even before predictions land.