New here? How to read these predictions
- Win probability
- Our model's estimate that a fighter wins — e.g. 72% means we'd expect them to win roughly 7 of 10 times.
- Confidence interval (CI)
- The range the true probability likely falls in. Wider = less certain. A pick'em fight has a wide band; a clear favourite a narrow one.
- Edge
- How much higher our probability is than the bookmaker's implied odds. Positive edge = we think it's underpriced.
- EV (expected value)
- Average return if you placed the bet many times. +15% EV means about 15c profit per $1 staked, on average.
- Risk tiers
- Conservative leans to safe favourites, Balanced blends, Aggressive chases bigger-odds longshots. Pick what suits you.
- Edge badges
- Strong / Solid / Slight edge rank how much value the model sees — and how big a stake it suggests. They're not a promise the bet wins.
Tap any fight row to open the full model breakdown. New to the model itself? How it works · FAQ.
UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit
- Ciryl Gane eats 3.8 fewer strikes per minute
- the case against Josh Hokit lands 4.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Josh Hokit out-volumes opponents at 10.3 sig/min vs Ciryl Gane's 5.4
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Gane
Ciryl Gane eats 3.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Hokit
Josh Hokit lands 4.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Hokit
Josh Hokit rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
04 KO rate favours Hokit
Josh Hokit finishes by KO 39% more often
-
05 Takedown defence favours Hokit
Josh Hokit stuffs 31% more incoming takedowns
-
06 Finish rate favours Hokit
Josh Hokit finishes 18% more of their wins
- Kayla Harrison eats 1.3 fewer strikes per minute
- Kayla Harrison taps opponents 50% more often
- Kayla Harrison rides a 1-fight longer win streak
- the case against Amanda Nunes finishes by KO 44% more often
- layoff Nunes hasn't fought since Jun 2023 — ring rust is hard to price, so the model widens its uncertainty here
- Amanda Nunes has a 15-fight UFC experience edge (18 vs 3)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Harrison
Kayla Harrison eats 1.3 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 KO rate favours Nunes
Amanda Nunes finishes by KO 44% more often
-
03 Submission rate favours Harrison
Kayla Harrison taps opponents 50% more often
-
04 Win streak favours Harrison
Kayla Harrison rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
05 Striking volume favours Nunes
Amanda Nunes lands 0.2 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 Takedown defence favours Harrison
Kayla Harrison stuffs 19% more incoming takedowns
- Yousri Belgaroui lands 5.0 more sig strikes per minute
- Yousri Belgaroui eats 0.7 fewer strikes per minute
- Yousri Belgaroui finishes 78% more of their wins
- the case against Caio Borralho stuffs 17% more incoming takedowns
- Yousri Belgaroui out-volumes opponents at 8.3 sig/min vs Caio Borralho's 3.3
-
01 Striking volume favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui lands 5.0 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui eats 0.7 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui finishes 78% more of their wins
-
04 KO rate favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui finishes by KO 89% more often
-
05 Win streak favours Belgaroui
Yousri Belgaroui rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
06 Takedown defence favours Borralho
Caio Borralho stuffs 17% more incoming takedowns
- Kevin Holland eats 0.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Kevin Holland taps opponents 21% more often
- the case against Uros Medic rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Uros Medic rides a 4-fight win streak (Kevin Holland: 1)
-
01 Win streak favours Medic
Uros Medic rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
02 Striking volume favours Medic
Uros Medic lands 1.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 KO rate favours Medic
Uros Medic finishes by KO 58% more often
-
04 Finish rate favours Medic
Uros Medic finishes 45% more of their wins
-
05 Strikes absorbed favours Holland
Kevin Holland eats 0.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
06 Submission rate favours Holland
Kevin Holland taps opponents 21% more often
- Bilal Hasan eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Bilal Hasan finishes by KO 56% more often
- Bilal Hasan finishes 36% more of their wins
- Bilal Hasan has never been finished in 1 fights
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 KO rate favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan finishes by KO 56% more often
-
03 Finish rate favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan finishes 36% more of their wins
-
04 Win streak favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
05 Striking volume favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan lands 0.4 more sig strikes per minute
-
06 Durability favours Hasan
Bilal Hasan has been finished 40% less often
- Charles Radtke eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Charles Radtke rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- Charles Radtke finishes 31% more of their wins
- the case against Stephen Thompson lands 1.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Stephen Thompson out-volumes opponents at 4.0 sig/min vs Charles Radtke's 2.5
-
01 Striking volume favours Thompson
Stephen Thompson lands 1.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Radtke
Charles Radtke eats 0.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Win streak favours Radtke
Charles Radtke rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
04 Finish rate favours Radtke
Charles Radtke finishes 31% more of their wins
-
05 Takedown defence favours Radtke
Charles Radtke stuffs 37% more incoming takedowns
-
06 KO rate favours Radtke
Charles Radtke finishes by KO 21% more often
- Chris Duncan taps opponents 34% more often
- Chris Duncan hits 0.15 more takedowns per minute
- Chris Duncan eats 0.1 fewer strikes per minute
- the case against Drew Dober rides a 2-fight longer win streak
- Drew Dober has never been finished in 27 fights
-
01 Win streak favours Dober
Drew Dober rides a 2-fight longer win streak
-
02 KO rate favours Dober
Drew Dober finishes by KO 52% more often
-
03 Submission rate favours Duncan
Chris Duncan taps opponents 34% more often
-
04 Takedown volume favours Duncan
Chris Duncan hits 0.15 more takedowns per minute
-
05 Strikes absorbed favours Duncan
Chris Duncan eats 0.1 fewer strikes per minute
-
06 Finish rate favours Dober
Drew Dober finishes 8% more of their wins
- Terrance McKinney lands 4.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Terrance McKinney finishes 47% more of their wins
- Terrance McKinney finishes by KO 47% more often
- the case against Jim Miller eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
- Terrance McKinney out-volumes opponents at 7.8 sig/min vs Jim Miller's 2.9
-
01 Striking volume favours McKinney
Terrance McKinney lands 4.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
02 Strikes absorbed favours Miller
Jim Miller eats 1.2 fewer strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours McKinney
Terrance McKinney finishes 47% more of their wins
-
04 KO rate favours McKinney
Terrance McKinney finishes by KO 47% more often
-
05 Win streak favours Miller
Jim Miller rides a 1-fight longer win streak
-
06 Takedown defence favours McKinney
Terrance McKinney stuffs 25% more incoming takedowns
- Baisangur Susurkaev lands 3.1 more sig strikes per minute
- Baisangur Susurkaev finishes 33% more of their wins
- Baisangur Susurkaev taps opponents 33% more often
- the case against Donte Johnson eats 2.8 fewer strikes per minute
- Baisangur Susurkaev out-volumes opponents at 6.0 sig/min vs Donte Johnson's 2.9
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Johnson
Donte Johnson eats 2.8 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev lands 3.1 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Finish rate favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev finishes 33% more of their wins
-
04 Submission rate favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev taps opponents 33% more often
-
05 Takedown defence favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev stuffs 23% more incoming takedowns
-
06 Striking accuracy favours Susurkaev
Baisangur Susurkaev is 11% more accurate on the feet
- Bia Mesquita eats 1.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Bia Mesquita rides a 3-fight longer win streak
- Bia Mesquita lands 1.3 more sig strikes per minute
- the case against Macy Chiasson stuffs 62% more incoming takedowns
- Bia Mesquita rides a 3-fight win streak (Macy Chiasson: 0)
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita eats 1.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Win streak favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita rides a 3-fight longer win streak
-
03 Striking volume favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita lands 1.3 more sig strikes per minute
-
04 Submission rate favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita taps opponents 86% more often
-
05 Finish rate favours Mesquita
Bia Mesquita finishes 50% more of their wins
-
06 Takedown defence favours Chiasson
Macy Chiasson stuffs 62% more incoming takedowns
- Juan Diaz eats 3.6 fewer strikes per minute
- Juan Diaz taps opponents 100% more often
- Juan Diaz hits 0.55 more takedowns per minute
- the case against Adrian Yanez lands 4.5 more sig strikes per minute
- Adrian Yanez out-volumes opponents at 5.9 sig/min vs Juan Diaz's 1.4
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Diaz
Juan Diaz eats 3.6 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Yanez
Adrian Yanez lands 4.5 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 Submission rate favours Diaz
Juan Diaz taps opponents 100% more often
-
04 KO rate favours Yanez
Adrian Yanez finishes by KO 73% more often
-
05 Takedown volume favours Diaz
Juan Diaz hits 0.55 more takedowns per minute
-
06 Finish rate favours Diaz
Juan Diaz finishes 27% more of their wins
- Nazim Sadykhov lands 2.9 more sig strikes per minute
- Nazim Sadykhov has been KO'd 71% less often
- Nazim Sadykhov has been finished 71% less often
- the case against Jefferson Nascimento eats 3.5 fewer strikes per minute
- Nazim Sadykhov out-volumes opponents at 4.7 sig/min vs Jefferson Nascimento's 1.8
-
01 Strikes absorbed favours Nascimento
Jefferson Nascimento eats 3.5 fewer strikes per minute
-
02 Striking volume favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov lands 2.9 more sig strikes per minute
-
03 KO durability favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov has been KO'd 71% less often
-
04 Durability favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov has been finished 71% less often
-
05 Submission rate favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov taps opponents 14% more often
-
06 Finish rate favours Sadykhov
Nazim Sadykhov finishes 10% more of their wins
The matrix has identified no value yet — SportsBet odds may not be published.